Letter of Response - July, 2006 revisions and additional narratives
---Changes to the DC Program Application:
Response to reviewer comments (linked above)
CH462 added to list of courses
Instructional faculty page revised
DC Standards Matrix updated with narrative from letter now imbedded into the Standards 3.0-11.0
Course syllabi modified to include CSSS
TE443 table of contents from textbook
Link to Education courses in DC program
Application for State Approval of
Teacher Preparation Specialty Programs
Phone: (517) 335-4610 *** Fax: (517) 373-0542
Directions:
I. Application Information |
|
|
Institution |
|
|
MDE
Endorsement Area and Code (from Application Attachment 2) |
Chemistry (DC) |
|
Date
of this Application |
February 4, 2005, Revised July 2006 |
|
Name
and Title of Unit Head |
Dr. David Myton Chair, |
|
Signature
of Unit Head |
|
II. Contact Information for Questions Related to This Application |
|
|
Contact
Person’s Name and Title |
Dr. David Myton Assoc. Prof. of Chemistry and Education |
|
Contact
Person’s Phone Number |
(906) 635-2349 |
|
Contact
Person’s Fax Number |
(906) 635-7565 |
|
Contact
Person’s E-Mail Address |
|
III. Type of Request for Approval (Indicate One) |
|
|
New
program for institution |
|
|
U.S.
Department of Education Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP)
Code, if vocational occupational area |
|
|
Compliance
with State Board of Education new or modified program criteria |
X |
|
Experimental
program |
|
|
Program
amendment (See Section IX for guidelines) |
|
IV. Institutional Representatives |
|||||
|
Name/Title |
Specialty |
Mailing Address |
E-mail Address |
Phone |
Fax |
|
Dr. David Myton, Assoc Prof Chemistry |
Environmental, Analytical |
Lake Superior State University
650 W. Easterday Avenue, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 |
(906) 635-2349 |
(906) 635-7565 |
|
|
Dr. Gene Wicks, High School
Science Teacher |
Organic synthetic chemistry |
Sault Area Public Schools
876 Marquette Avenue, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 |
(906) 635-3839 |
(906) 635-6619 |
|
|
Mr. Lynn Dunham, HS Science
Teacher |
Science Education |
Sault Area Public
Schools 876 Marquette Avenue, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 |
(906) 635-3839 |
(906) 635-6619 |
|
|
Dr. Barb Keller, Assoc Prof |
Analytical, Instrumental |
Lake Superior State
University 650 W. Easterday Avenue, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 |
(906) 635-2438 |
(906 635-2266 |
|
Section 1. Summary of Course Requirements
Section 2. Program Summary
Section 3. Instructional faculty
Section 4. Candidate Preparation
Section 5. Collaborative Partnerships
Section 6. Professional Development and Support
Section 7. Standards Matrix
Section 8. Special Recognition
Section 9. Instructional Methods
Section 10. Course Descriptions
Section 11. Course Syllabi
Chemistry (DC) Specialty Program
|
|
|
(Narrative
below) |
a. Describe the philosophy, rationale, and objectives
of the specialty program and explain how the program is consistent with the
philosophy, rationale, and conceptual framework of the unit.
The mission of the Department
of Chemistry and Environmental Science is to deliver a rigorous and relevant
curriculum that contributes to the intellectual and personal growth of its
candidates. We offer the B.S. Chemistry, B.S. Forensic Chemistry, the B.A.
Chemistry, and integrated B.S. degrees in Environmental Chemistry,
Environmental Science, Environmental Health, and Environmental Management in a
mutually supportive environment of teaching, learning, and student-centered
research. The primary goal of the Department of Chemistry and Environmental
Science is to prepare a diverse group of candidates for careers in industry,
government, or for entry into graduate and professional schools. The
preparation of our candidates includes developing their critical thinking and
communication skills, their knowledge of modern instrumentation, their ability
to adapt to changing work conditions, their ability to work productively and
cooperatively with other people, and their inclination for lifelong learning.
The department is committed to the preparation of highly qualified and well
prepared teacher candidates. The School of Environmental and Physical
Sciences offers majors and minors in teachable programs for both the elementary
and secondary level. These include (pending approval by the MDE) programs
in chemistry (Major/minor), Earth/space science (Major/minor), physical science
(Comprehensive Major and Major only) and integrated science for both the
elementary (M/m) and secondary (Comprehensive Major only) levels. With
two of our faculty members holding dual appointments to the School of Education
our programs are closely aligned with state standards, our instructors well
informed of the mission and values of the teacher preparation program, and our
course content accessible and focused on the preparation of high quality
teacher candidates.
The
In keeping with the logo of
PERSONAL
With
respect and understanding for individual differences and shared heritages
NATURAL
For
whom learning is an ongoing lifelong process, and
With
high academic and professional standards
We believe that the act of
teaching and learning involves a framework of research, reflection, and
response. We see these elements as an evolving
cyclical process, a pathway that learners and leaders of learning must employ
to create powerful knowledge bases, develop as participatory members of a
democratic society, and establish and maintain environments conducive to
learning. The process of research, reflection, and response is focused upon
four areas that we believe are the essential elements of expert teaching. These areas include: content knowledge,
pedagogical knowledge, professional dispositions, and learning
communities. At the center of the
process of acquiring and applying the skills and knowledge of professional
practice we place the learner.
We see the learner as inclusive of all stakeholders in
schooling and education.
What is …
Research: Expert teachers understand the need to
maintain a current perspective on the numerous facets of education. A professional educator strives to engage in
the study of pedagogy, examination of the literature related to teaching and
explore avenues for the transformation of theory to practice. The act of
research is often precipitated by observed events in the classroom and
school. When dilemmas arise, expert
teachers ask questions and then seek answers through research.
Reflection: John Dewey stated “The active, persistent,
careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in light of
the grounds that support it is reflective thought” (1933, p.9). Expert teacher are continuously reflecting
upon their practice. Engaging in
critique, they look at the elements of teaching as well as their whole practice
within the contexts in which pedagogy is engaged. The act of reflection requires the teacher to
question their behavior, their beliefs as determinants of practice, and
carefully consider the responsibility of being a leader of learning.
Response:
The act of engaging in pedagogy should be responsive. To implement change or modifications in one’s
practice to better facilitate learning is a key element in the repertoire of an
expert teacher. Response however is not
change for the sake of change. Response
is the act of planned change given careful research and reflection. The professional educator employs change in
relationship to perceived need, then after review of literature and active
research within the classroom, supported by careful reflection, the teacher
implements the change. The expert
teacher then monitors the response, actively engaging in continued research and
reflection to better their pedagogical practice.
Content Knowledge: Teachers need to be broadly educated in the liberal arts and sciences,
and be able to knowledgeable of the interdependence of the disciplines. They
must be able to analyze and synthesize ideas, information, and data and make
applications of knowledge in inquiry, problem-solving, and critical thinking.
The professional educator must be an effective communicator, possessing the
skills and abilities of listening, speaking, writing, and reading.
Pedagogical Knowledge: Professional educators must have the knowledge to
effectively engage individuals in the learning process. In order to engage in teaching excellence
they must posses a strong understanding of cognition, the multidimensional
dimensions of learners and learning, and demonstrate the skills of research,
reflection, and responsive pedagogy.
Via an understanding of human growth and development, a variety of
instructional techniques, assessments, materials and technologies, and an
abundance of practical experience in classrooms, teacher candidates should be
able to mature as exemplar professional educators.
Professional Dispositions: Teachers are stewards of society. They are the models and guides of future
generations. In light of their influence in classrooms and schools, all
teachers and teacher candidates must model the ethics, values and dispositions
of professional educators. They should be able to engage in active reflection,
self-critique and accept constructive criticism from others. The developing professional educator should
invite and respect others' points of view and incorporate reasonable
suggestions from peers and experts.
Teachers and teacher candidates should be committed to life-long
learning and the belief that all candidates can learn.
Learning Communities: Schools and classrooms are microcosms of society, and as such are the venues for candidates to learn and grow as participatory members of the community. The themes of caring, responsibility, democracy, and stewardship are woven into the fabric of curriculum as teachers and teacher candidates take on the role of facilitators of environments conducive to learning while modeling tolerance, dignity, participation and shared decision making.
As secondary-level chemistry teachers, our teacher candidates have a solid foundation in the content knowledge of their discipline. Their content knowledge has a research basis as faculty incorporate their own research interests into the curriculum, as current developments in the discipline are incorporated into the classroom dialog, and as research into how students learn and understand is applied to the teaching of chemistry. Candidates are frequently engaged in dialog through their courses, like TE443 Secondary Science Methods, in reflecting on their own understanding of science concepts, how to communicate those clearly to novice learners, and to assess student understanding through authentic experiences and exercises. As candidates apply their pedagogical knowledge gained in the professional education sequence to the teaching of chemistry with progressively higher levels of responsibility and autonomy - moving from early field experience, through presentation of single topics, lessons, units to the full responsibility of the student teaching internship. Candidates are assessed throughout these experiences, field work and internship, against the standards of the ELSMT, against content knowledge expectations, and in their demonstrations of appropriate professional dispositions. In ever increasing steps the candidate prepare for their full assimilation into the learning community of their school and profession during their student teaching internship as a chemistry teacher under the mentorship of a highly qualified classroom teacher and a seasoned veteran who serves as the university supervisor and evaluator.
b. Describe the sequence of courses and/or experiences
to develop an understanding of the structures, skills, core concepts, ideas,
values, facts, methods of inquiry, and uses of technology.
CH115/116
General Chemistry I/II
CH225/226
Organic Chemistry I/II
CH231
Quantitative Analysis
CH332
Instrumental Analysis
CH361/362
Physical Chemistry I/II
CH451
Biochemistry I
CH462 Adv. Inorganic and
Physical Chemistry Lab, and (corrected July
2006)
TE443
Secondary Science Methods
Additional chemistry
electives are available within the department including Advanced Inorganic
Chemistry, Biochemistry II, Laboratory Apprenticeships, Environmental Chemistry
I/II, Environmental Systems Analysis, Environmental Law, Solid/Hazardous Waste
Management and a sequence of courses about Geographic Information Systems. The chemistry major will complete one year of
calculus and one year of calculus-based physics as departmental cognates.
All candidates completing
majors in the department also complete a senior thesis project including a formal
paper, poster and presentation at our annual undergraduate research day. These projects are also often presented at
our regional science conferences; many in recent years have been recognized for
their innovation and scientific merit.
As a capstone event, the senior project including the presentation of
the project outcomes. These
presentations serve as a landmark event whereby the candidate moves from
recipient of knowledge prepared by others (a student) to become the expert in a
field, to uncover and develop new knowledge and to participate in the
dissemination of this knowledge to others (a researcher/teacher). Candidates use appropriate technologies in
the conducting of this research (analytical chemical instrumentation, library
research, quantitative and statistical analysis, etc) and in the presentation
(computer software suites, presentation software, audio/visual presentation
equipment, posters, etc).
Formal admission to the
School of Education teacher certification program also requires (in addition to
university general education requirements of one year English, one semester of
speech, one year of social sciences, on year of humanities and a course in
student diversity), the following items:
CS101
Introduction to Computer Science – addressing basic competencies in technology
MA207
Statistics
Formal
Interview
Impromptu
timed essay – assessing written communication skills
2.70
minimum overall GPA with no grade below C in major/minor, and
B-
minimum grade in professional education sequence courses.
c. Describe how
candidates are prepared to utilize a variety of instructional approaches to
address the various learning styles of candidates.
Student learning styles are a significant topic addressed in the professional education core sequence, especially in TE250 Student Diversity and Schools and TE301 Learning Theory and Teaching Practice. In TE301 candidates analyze various approaches to teaching and learning and the decisions which teachers make in applying theory to diverse classroom situations. TE443 Secondary Science Methods extends these topics to the science classroom and provide a discipline specific context for continuing these discussions while candidate’s field placements are focused on instructional practice in their science specialty.
d. Describe any
differences that may exist between elementary or secondary preparation to teach
in each major or minor area (e.g., instructional resources, field placements,
instructional techniques), if applicable.
The chemistry endorsement is
only available to secondary candidates
e. Describe how
the program incorporates gender equity, multi-cultural, and global perspectives
into the teaching of the subject area.
Student diversity, and
developing an appreciation of diversity issues in science education is
addressed in TE443 Secondary Science Methods, a course required for all
majors/minors. For example, included in
this course is an activity where the candidates prepare lessons focusing on the
scientific contributions of minorities and women. The professional education
core sequence contains a course devoted to this issue: TE250 Student Diversity
and Schools. TE250 is required for all
teacher candidates prepared by
f. Describes
how the program prepares candidates to use multiple methods of assessment
appropriate to this specialty area.
Assessment, in addition to
experiences gained through the content courses in chemistry, is addressed in TE
443 Secondary Science Methods. There
candidates develop traditional and authentic assessments for both classroom and
laboratory based activities, and apply the concepts learned in the professional
education core courses such as TE431 Secondary Methods to the chemistry
classroom. In TE443 candidates develop
assessment instruments for curriculum units they develop based on their
specialty area.
|
Instructional Faculty (revised July06)
|
|
Submit
available data specific to the program area being reviewed |
MTTC Chemistry Test Summary Data
|
|
No chemistry candidates |
|
|
Chemistry minors = 1 |
|
|
No chemistry candidates |
|
|
Chemistry minors = 2 |
|
|
Chemistry minors = 2 |
|
April 12, 2003 |
No chemistry candidates |
|
|
Chemistry majors = 1, chemistry minors = 3 |
|
|
No chemistry candidates |
Aggregation of student pass rate
data is necessary to protect the identity of students in programs with limited
enrollment. The chemistry department
worked with six unique individuals since the fall of 2002, one completing a
major in chemistry and five with majors in biology who completed the approved
chemistry minor. All but one student in
six has passed the MTTC chemistry, and that one has yet to begin student
teaching. Initial pass rates for biology
majors taking the chemistry content exam are quite low, with scaled scores
below the state averages generally in the areas of properties of matter and
energy, chemical bonds & chemical reactions. This may be expected since these topics are
taught in the freshman chemistry sequence: CH115/116, taken early in their
academic career. Students who reviewed
the foundational concepts from General Chemistry have all been successful in
their later attempts on the chemistry test.
|
Subject |
Test
Code |
Test
Date |
#
Examinees |
Scaled
Mean Score |
# Pass |
% Pass |
# Not
Pass |
% Not
Pass |
Sub
area pass % |
|||
|
Chemistry |
18 |
7/15/2000 |
2 |
228 |
1 |
50 |
1 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
0 |
50 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
10/7/2000 |
1 |
242 |
1 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
1/13/2001 |
4 |
224.5 |
3 |
75 |
1 |
25 |
75 |
75 |
50 |
0 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
4/21/2001 |
1 |
217 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
100 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
7/14/2001 |
1 |
239 |
1 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
0 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
7/13/2002 |
1 |
297 |
1 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
1/11/2003 |
4 |
231.8 |
2 |
50 |
2 |
50 |
100 |
50 |
50 |
75 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
7/12/2003 |
2 |
226 |
1 |
50 |
1 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
50 |
0 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
10/18/2003 |
2 |
250.5 |
2 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
50 |
100 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
4/3/2004 |
1 |
217 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
100 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Chemistry |
18 |
10/16/2004 |
3 |
237.7 |
3 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
100 |
67 |
33 |
|
Statewide
Chemistry |
18 |
|
|
235.4 |
|
71 |
|
29 |
92 |
55 |
55 |
61 |
|
Field placements are integrated
throughout the professional education sequence beginning with TE250 Student
Diversity and Schools where the focus is on tutoring experiences. In subsequent courses, after admission to the
During the internship candidates work for approximately 22 weeks under the direct supervision of a classroom teacher and the periodic oversight of a university supervisor. Candidates meet regularly with a university instructor for a seminar course, and are also concurrently enrolled in a graduate course each of the two semesters of the internship. During the fall semester, candidates complete TE602 Reflection and Inquiry in Teaching Practice I examining qualitative and quantitative research methods and developing their own research based question addressing student learning. During the spring semester students complete a second graduate level course on curriculum planning and implementation, TE605.
Student teaching internship
placements extend across two university semesters, beginning generally with the
start of the academic year in August/September and continuing through
mid-April. Candidates are strongly
advised to use the transition at mid-year to change their placement venue to
gain experience at a second level or subject area in the spring. Such changes in placement do require the
consent and concurrence of the building principals and teachers, and in some
cases teachers wish to continue with a single student the entire time. Wherever possible candidates are placed in
situations where they can teach in both their major and minor fields, either
through split morning/afternoon assignments with different teachers, or
placements in different schools for each semester.
|
Section 6 Professional Development and Support |
Postponed until 2005-20012 |
|
Standards matrix (Chemistry - DC -REVISED) (revised
July 2006 to include additional narratives supporting Standards
3.0-11.0) |
|
Section 8 Special Recognition |
Optional |
|
Describe how
candidates are prepared to teach in this specific specialty area. Describe how
this program will utilize technological resources.
|
Lake Superior State University teacher candidates are prepared in instructional methods through both the professional education sequence (TE150-TE443) and through courses in their chemistry curriculum. In the professional education sequence, the secondary candidate completes TE430 General Methods for Secondary Teachers (a study of strategies and methodologies to facilitate learning), TE440 Reading in the Content Area (a study of reading methods) and TE443 Science Methods for Secondary Teachers (curriculum, objectives, content, materials, organization methods and assessment). Each of these courses has a required fieldwork component where the candidate applies the concepts and theories through modeling and practice lessons in secondary classrooms as appropriate to their certification.
Chemistry candidates are familiar with a wide range of analytical chemical instrumentation, and use that equipment in the laboratory component of their chemistry curriculum, and in fulfillment of their senior research projects (project applies only to majors). Technology in this context includes familiarity and use with spectrophotometers (UV/Vis, IR, Mass, Fluorometry, ICPMS), chromatography (solid, gas, liquid, ion), and analytical (balances, electrodeposition, sample collection, digesters). Candidates also become proficient in the use of computer-based technologies used as instrument interface/acquisition devices, for preparation of reports and papers, for quantitative analysis, regression and statistical analysis, and presentation software with A/V projectors present in many of our instructional classrooms and laboratories.
Technology is integrated
throughout the professional education sequence, in fulfillment of the 7th
standard of the Entry Level Standards for Michigan Teachers (ELSMT). The
|
Provide
descriptions of all courses contained on Application Attachment 3. Descriptions must provide enough information
to show that standards could logically be met in these courses. |
Course descriptions for each course are published in the university calendar (catalog), and reproduced here for reference. Catalog course descriptions broadly describe course objectives, credit earned and prerequisites. The course syllabi, provided in Section 11, are the more complete record of course content, objectives, assessment, and alignment to the content standards.
|
|
Provide a
representative syllabus for each required course (those listed on Application
Attachment 3 and referenced in the standards matrix). |